What is Lorem Ipsum?
A few words of advice
written by SAI
filed under CAREER | RELATIONSHIPS | MINDSET
published JANUARY 1, 2024
TLDR
-
Shift viewing advice as binary (good or bad) to probabilistically achieving your desired result
-
3 advice pre-conditions of 1) emotional readiness 2) thorough contextual understanding 3) assessing current chance of desired result
-
4 advice conditions of 1) messenger 2) message 3) space-time 4) probability of desired result chances
-
2 advice post-conditions of 1) interpretation 2) aligned action as a % of advice
example statements
-
“I keep getting bad advice from people.”
-
“Can someone — anyone — please help me?”
-
“There’s all this information out there on what to do (to lose weight / to find a job, to be happy, etc.), but what do I actually do?”
DEFINING ADVICE
Let’s first get on the same page of what “advice” actually is. My definition of advice is any information that we can act on that will increase the expected value of our desired result.
What does “expected value of our desired result” mean? I believe that life is a long game of probabilities. And in probabilistic situations, the higher the expected value, the more likely it is we would take that action.
Here’s a look at my equation
-
Desired result = Probability*Space Freedom Value + Probability*Time Freedom Value + Probability*Energy Freedom Value + Probability*Money Freedom Value
For a full deep dive into that, read the Life Expected Value newsletter.
The question is what we’re optimizing for. That’s what the previous newsletter addressed in terms of Desires, pictured as the Desire Tree. This is assuming you have a desire already in mind and need assistance to achieve that desire.
So to help rephrase my definition of advice, it’s anything that can help increase the chances of us reaching our desires. And advice from others can be a great way to increase those chances of us accomplishing our goals.
With that definition established, let’s deconstruct the other aspects of advice.
Quick side note: Going forward, I’m going to refer to the person sharing any advice as the advisor and the person receiving the advice as the advisee.
ADVICE PRE-CONDITIONS
Before there is any actual advice shared, I believe there are at least 3 pre-conditions to make any advice more optimal.
-
The advisee is emotionally ready to receive the advice
-
The advisor understands the advisee’s context
-
Both parties understand the current chance of success
![03 Advice Pre-Conditions.png](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/400f70_d0e0b851abe347bd9e36c110da37c160~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_723,h_723,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/03%20Advice%20Pre-Conditions.png)
I don’t know about you but I’ve been in situations where either I wasn’t in the right headspace to receive advice from someone or I shared advice when all they were looking for was emotional support and validation. It’s not a fun feeling. On either side. You can avoid lots of ‘unsolicited advice’ situations by recognizing this first pre-condition to advice.
To ensure that the person is actually ready to receive advice, you can ask them a question like “do you want some ideas to improve the situation?” That way, they have the option of saying no and you have a better idea of how to support them.
Now if the advisee comes to you first saying they’re seeking advice and guidance, then they’re theoretically providing that emotional readiness proactively, so you’re good to continue. *Each situation is different so approach each with care.
So that’s the first pre-condition.
The next pre-condition is that the advisor understands the advisee’s context. This is an open-ended pre-condition with it spearheaded by the simple question of “Why?” What is the desired result of the advisee? This comes back to the definition we established above. If they don’t actually know what result they’re looking for, that’s completely valid, but it just requires a different approach.
If they have an idea but it’s not fully developed, your role as the advisor is to place yourself in a journalist’s shoes. Ask questions that allow them to elaborate on the desire. You want all the context you can get. What put them in that position? What are they looking for? When are they looking for that desired result? What have they tried in the past? How has their mindset been throughout those previous attempts? Who else have they asked?
Just as a journalist would do, get all the context you can as if you’re about to write a story on this, describing all the angles of something. It seems like a lot of work, but it actually makes your job as the advisor easier because you can advise something that much more potent and contextual.
The third pre-condition, which is related to the above, is to make a note of what the advisee feels are the chances of their desired result if they don’t take and act on any advice.
This establishes a baseline for where they’re at. Do they think they have a 20% chance or 80% chance of reaching their target without your input?
“I’m really lost right now. My desired result is to find a job I like. I think if I continue with what I know without any help from anyone, my chances of getting that job are 10%.”
Something like that is very helpful to get everyone on the same page. It also makes evident how important the potential advice could be. You can’t see the change in before and after of chances if you don’t establish a before. That’s the purpose of this.
Now this may seem unnecessary, impractical, and unmeasurable, and therefore irrelevant. But if you look at virtually every piece of advice, the chances of success are assumed — usually very high. All I’m doing is just making explicit what is implicit.
Okay, now the advisee is emotionally ready for advice, you have as much context as you need, and the baseline desired result chances have been established. Now what? Now comes the actual advice. Let’s break that down as well.
There are 4 aspects to the actual advice itself.
-
Messenger
-
Message
-
Space-Time
-
Probability of desired result expected value
![04 4 Aspects of Advice.png](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/400f70_5072ff83fdf84dfea10b16958bc6d749~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_754,h_754,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/04%204%20Aspects%20of%20Advice.png)
The first factor is the messenger. This is usually not explicitly stated but it is something to inspect from both the advisor and advisor side. If you’re seeking business advice, are you going to ask someone who’s been a CEO for 2 successful companies, or your friend who’s still deep in med school? If you’re seeking relationship advice, are you going to ask someone who’s been in a happy marriage for 20 years or someone who’s never been in a serious relationship?
I’m not saying to not even ask or to listen to someone who isn’t perceived to have the experience or expertise for what you’re accomplishing. I’m saying to also ask people who have that experience and probably put more weight behind the advice of those who have had success in the area you’re looking to succeed in.
This seems like a straightforward statement — get advice from people who have experience doing what you want to do — but I’ve fallen into that trap before.
Even as the advisor, it’s good to take a quick second to ask yourself what qualifies you to provide certain advice to someone. A healthy skepticism, not a vicious cycle of self-doubt.
The second aspect of advice is the actual message; the content of what the advisor is saying. This is what people think of as the actual advice. What specific action is the advisor recommending?
These recommendations actually fall into my TLDR of Life categories.
-
Thinking
-
Learning
-
Doing
-
Relating
The following are examples of each of the above, in order:
“If you have this mindset during sales calls, it’ll help you get more clients.” (Thinking)
“Learn this skill of day trading, you could make lots of money from it.” (Learning)
“You should travel to Indonesia, it’s so beautiful and relatively inexpensive.” (Doing)
“Let me introduce you to this person. I think they’ll have some insight for you.” (Relating)
The next aspect of advice is the space-time aspect. There’s actually a few sub-factors here. The quantity and duration as it relates to time. The physical or digital location as it relates to space.
For quantity, how many times do you need to take that action?
For duration, for how long do you need to take that action?
For example, let’s say someone told you to learn a skill to increase your income-earning ability. That’s good direction but, technically speaking, vague advice.
How long do you need to take an action to learn that skill? Does doing a certification suffice? Or do they intend on you doing a 6-month bootcamp? Or perhaps doing an unpaid internship? And is it purely a time-based goal or is it results-based? E.g. You haven’t truly learned this skill until you’ve made at least $1000 from it.
Moreover, how many times do you need to take that action? If someone recommends you a habit of exercising to lose weight, how many times do you need to go to the gym? Which exercises do you need to do? How many reps?
Bringing in the space factor and continuing with the metaphor, which gym do you need to go to? Can you do some or all of these exercises at home? What about the mix of each? What about a digital subscription to a service like Peloton or Beach Body on Demand?
When you take a step back on this space-time factor, it’s oftentimes implicit in advice.
“You should meet this person”…(once to start with and see where it goes from there).
“You should message recruiters on LinkedIn to increase the chances of your profile being seen”…(for 5 recruiters a day for a month).
The space-time factor essentially captures the rest of the context needed for the advised action.
The point of making this explicit is to reduce the uncertainty of the interpretation of advice by the advisee. The more vague the advice, the more room for interpretation and deviation in application.
The final aspect to the advice that’s worth making explicit is the probability of the desired result expected value. Revisiting my definition of advice, the advisee is looking to increase the chances of their desired result happening. So I believe it’s important to verbalize what they can expect as a result of taking the message within the context that you’ve already provided.
Similar to the space-time factor, it may be implied within the advice, but rarely ever mentioned as part of the advice. This is related to the pre-condition of establishing a current state baseline. When the advisor delivers the advice, they should ideally also state how much they think the advisee can change their desired result chances by.
In the example that had it set at 10% success, the advisor would say something like, “If you talk to 3 new people a week in a 1x1 setting within the industry that you want to get a job in for 3 straight months, then I think you’ll see that 10% go to a 40% chance of you landing a job.”
Of course the percentages are all subjective. Life is not a simulation that you can restart at any time and get the true probabilities. It’s just a relative measure. But as long as both parties are on the same page about it, then that’s what matters.
Additionally, by making these probabilities explicit, it sets the expectation that even if they follow the advice to a tee, it may not work 100% of the time. It mitigates the advisor being set up for ridicule and the advisee being set up for disappointment.
THE ACTION
Finally, there is what happens after the advice is given. Perhaps the most important piece: the action. The action actually includes a step before that too, and that is the interpretation. Many of the steps outlined above mitigate the difference of interpretation, which may lead to different actions being taken. But nonetheless, there is always a degree of interpretation by the advisee.
![05 Advice Process.png](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/400f70_1cbca694a2ff4afd8c251aad2fdf7acc~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_754,h_754,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/05%20Advice%20Process.png)
We can mitigate it but, it’s not actually necessary to reduce it. That’s what makes you unique. You’ll have a special perspective on the situation that even the closest or most knowledgeable advisor may not truly understand. Leverage that to your advantage.
Let’s fast forward to you having taken the action and now it’s time to reflect, perhaps with the same advisor. What we want to get to is a % of alignment of action to advice. If something didn’t go according to plan or to advice, we want to limit the result being “well, that’s not what I intended when I said this” by the advisor. This is a crucial pseudo-metric to keep track of when receiving and implementing advice.
By tracking this, you can deduce where in the chain things may not have worked out (or did work out!). Was it the implementation? Was it the interpretation? Or was it the actual information? And was that potentially caused by the conditions or pre-conditions not being fully met?
One of the main points that I’m really getting at here is that there is no real good advice or bad advice. What we think of as good advice is really effective information in a thoroughly understood context with aligned action.
Good advice = Effective information AND understood context AND aligned action
![06 Good Advice Formula.png](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/400f70_8dc24623d9cf4061b66181f7753ee1e5~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_754,h_754,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/06%20Good%20Advice%20Formula.png)
Notice how these are all “And’s” in there, and not “Or’s”. If any one of these is off, then it’s perceived as bad advice. But really, there’s a lot more to it.
For those nerds out there like me,
Advice is &&, ~||.
Now it may seem like I’m unnecessarily adding variables to advice that don’t need to be there for most situations.
You’re right.
All these factors don’t come into play for menial advice. The reason I’m providing this framework is for those more important decisions that having all this context would be beneficial. You’ll know when you need a more in-depth framework like this. Some example situations of times to use this would be:
-
Making a large financial decision, personally or professionally (with whatever numbers are large to you)
-
How to allocate your time after you’ve left your job. (People will want to spend your new found time in ways that benefit them, so be cautious about how you do so)
-
Making a decision on several job offers available to you
-
How to find a job that you actually like
Some counter-examples of when you DO NOT need to use this framework are:
-
Which show to watch on Netflix
-
Which places to hit up when traveling to a new city
-
Which place to find parking
A meta example of advice is actually the premise of this TLDR of Life newsletter. This entire newsletter essay is advice about advice. I’m recommending what you should do. The thing is I don’t know your situation unless we’ve talked about it. So that’s why the advice has to be more generic because it has to fit in many contexts. When there are smaller groups or 1x1 settings, then the advice can be that much more curated to those individuals. That’s why I recommend you work with specialists in whatever field you’re looking for advice - personal trainer, life coach, financial advisor, fractional COO, etc.
This is an underlying reason why many leading content creators actually put all of their best content out for free or charge very little. The contexts in which the information can be applied is generalized. You pay more of a premium for their time in diagnosing your individual situation, your needs, and personalizing their general advice to you.
There is no real good advice or bad advice. What we think of as good advice is really effective information in a thoroughly understood context with aligned action.
what can i do?
Let’s revisit those statements you might have been saying.
-
“I keep getting bad advice from people.”
-
“Can someone help me.”
-
“There’s all this information out there on what to do (to lose weight / to find a job, to be happy, etc.), but what do I actually do?”
What can you do starting today to address these?
When you’re in situations that requires more in-depth advice…
-
Ensure the 3 pre-conditions for advice are met
-
The advisee is emotionally ready to receive the advice
-
The advisor understands the advisee’s context
-
Both parties understand the current chance of success
-
-
Ensure the advice contains all 4 conditions
-
Messenger is someone with relevant experience
-
Message
-
Space-Time
-
Probability of desired result expected value
-
-
Ensure the 2 post-conditions are met
-
Aligned interpretation of advice
-
Aligned action as a % of advice
-
Even armed with all this information and advice, however, it’s still pretty general. If you want deep, personalized advice, you can do that by working with me 1x1. 😀
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Sai is a Life Coach for Young Adults seeking to Live their Quarter Life on Easy Mode!